The Kentucky Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a case that could decide if the University of Kentucky breached a contract with its students. At issue is whether or not the university met its obligations to students when it changed the terms of their tuition fees and whether those changes violated state law.
Read the rest of the article here: https://www.ipgce.com/kentucky-supreme-court-argues-over-broken-contract/(opens in a new tab)
Contact us here: https://www.ipgce.com/contact-us
The case was brought by former student Ashley Garrett, who argues that the university violated her contractual rights when it increased tuition costs without providing adequate notice or an opportunity for meaningful input from affected students. The lawsuit also claims that UK’s actions violated Kentucky’s Consumer Protection Act, which requires companies to act in good faith when dealing with consumers.
At oral arguments, lawyers representing both sides presented their cases before the Kentucky Supreme Court justices. While the university’s attorneys argued that tuition fees were necessary to cover costs and maintain quality education, Garrett’s lawyers claimed that the changes were unlawful and constituted an unfair business practice.
The Kentucky Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision in the coming months. The outcome of this case could set a precedent that will determine how universities can change tuition fees going forward. Regardless of the decision, it is clear that students have rights regarding their educational contracts with universities, and the UK must be held accountable when they violate these rights.
Students and administrators have closely watched this legal battle, as its outcome could have far-reaching implications for future contracts between universities and their students. Students are hopeful that the Kentucky Supreme Court will decide in their favour, giving them more protection and assurance against possible changes to tuition fees. On the other hand, university administrators hope that the court recognises their need for flexibility in budgeting and managing educational costs.
Regardless of how this case is decided, it highlights the importance of students understanding their rights when entering into contracts with universities. Both sides need to be aware of what they can expect from each other so that everyone can benefit from any agreement made. Only then can a mutually beneficial relationship truly exist between students and universities.
What do you think?Need to find out more? Click Here
To find out about the courses we have on offer: Click Here
Join the Course: Click Here