Can Wikipedia be considered a reliable source?

When it comes to citing Wikipedia in academic writing, the answer is a bit more complicated than a simple yes or no. Generally speaking, Wikipedia should not be used as a primary source of information for academic papers, but it can still provide valuable background information and insights into particular topics.

Read the rest of the article here:  https://www.ipgce.com/can-wikipedia-be-considered-a-reliable-source/(opens in a new tab)

Contact us here: https://www.ipgce.com/contact-us

However, when using material from Wikipedia in an academic paper, there are certain steps that must be taken. Firstly, check if the article has reliable sources cited. Even though anyone can post on Wikipedia, most articles have references to back up their claims. Secondly, make sure the article is up-to-date—if it’s been several years since the article was written or edited last, the content may no longer be relevant. Finally, when citing Wikipedia, you should always make sure to include the title of the article and the date it was accessed. This is important so that readers can verify your sources.

Though Wikipedia may not be reliable enough for primary source citations in academic writing, it can certainly serve as a helpful starting point for research projects. With careful consideration and thoughtful use, Wikipedia can provide students with valuable insights into their topics and help them develop more informed arguments for their papers.

What do you think?

Meet Our Successful Graduates: Learn how our courses have propelled graduates into rewarding
careers. Explore their success stories here!

Discover More About Your Future: Interested in advancing your teaching career? Explore our
IPGCE, MA, and QTS courses today!

Explore Our Courses: Ready to take the next
step in your education journey? View our
comprehensive course offerings now!

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top